Arguments of Christopher Browning versus Daniel John Goldhagen Regardin

Arguments of Christopher Browning versus Daniel John Goldhagen Regarding The German View of the Holocaust The arguments of Christopher Browning and Daniel John Goldhagen contrast greatly based on the underlining meaning of the Holocaust to ordinary Germans. Why did ordinary citizens participate in the process of mass murder? Christopher Browning examines the history of a battalion of the Order Police who participated in mass shootings and deportations. He debunks the idea that these ordinary men were simply coerced to kill but stops short of Goldhagen's simplistic thesis. Browning uncovers the fact that Major Trapp offered at one time to excuse anyone from the task of killing who was "not up to it." Despite this offer, most of the men chose to kill anyway. Browning's traces how these murderers gradually became less "squeamish" about the killing process and delves into explanations of how and why people could behave in such a manner. Goldhagen's book however, has the merit of opening up a new perspective on ways of viewing the Holocaust, and it is the first to raise crucial questions about the extent to which eliminationist anti-Semitism was present among the German population as a whole. Using extensive testimonies from the perpetrators themselves, it offers a chilling insight into the mental and cognitive structures of hundreds of Germans directly involved in the killing operations. Anti-Semitism plays a primary factor in the argument from Goldhagen, as it is within his belief that anti-Semitism "more or less governed the ideational life of civil society" in pre-Nazi Germany . Goldhagen stated that a "Demonological anti-Semitism, of the virulent racial variety, was the common structure of the perpetrators' cognit... ...d in is own home. He was found by Soviet men in his home and taken to Siberia, because he was too young, in their point of view, to not be a member of the Nazi party. This is a man that Goldhagen cannot say is a fanatic anti-Semite and because of his own story to me I cannot deem the entire German population to be Goldhagen's 'ordinary Germans'. It is not an easy debate and will probably never be one but I would hope that someone could see that we cannot say something about an entire population. We would have to look at each member individually and then I am sure that we would find that some were those 'ordinary men', that Browning believed and some were the 'ordinary Germans' that Goldhagen believed in. Bibliography: Browning, Christopher R., Ordinary Men. Harper Perennial,New York, 1993 Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah. Random House, Inc. New York, 1996

African American Athletes Essay

American student athletes have always faced stereotypes in and out of the classroom, being seen as self-segregating or â€Å"dumb jocks† that really wouldn’t be at school if it weren’t for their athletic ability. Although these stereotypes are applied to both white and black athletes, African American students, especially men, feel it more than their white counterparts. African Americans are already, for the most part, seen as intellectually inferior, so when they are seen in an academic environment they are automatically judged. If they didn’t get into school just for being black, they got into school for being a black athlete. Excuses are made as to why African American student athletes and pro athletes dominate in the world of sports in general. From the time the black athlete stepped into the sports arena and began to compete with whites, white people have been looking for an explanation. In his article Sailes looks into the myths and stereotypes surrounding African American athletes, most of which have been created by whites. In loosely replicated the experiment that Sailes conducted with his students and in doing so I found that the stereotypes he discusses do exist and many people strongly believe in some of the myths. I interviewed both male and female athletes and non-athletes alike and surprisingly most of their answers to my questions were the same. I asked them all the same five questions; 1. Do you think African Americans dominate in sports? 2. Which Sports? 3. Are there certain positions they are better at? 4. Why? 5. Is their demeanor on the field or court different than that of a white athlete? and 6. Have you heard any myths about why black athletes are better? Interviewee #1, A white female on the basketball team at Gettysburg College felt that black athletes were better at all sports and in all positions, but particularly in basketball and football. She has learned from experience that black athletes are more loud and aggressive. It was her belief that African Americans are better at sports because of genetics. She also said that it could be because historically they have done hard labor and had menial jobs, so their physical condition has evolved. The one myth she has heard is that African Americans have an extra bone in their leg which makes them capable of jumping higher and running faster. Interviewee # 2, an African American football player stated that blacks are better at all sports, but especially football, in such positions as cornerback, running back, and wide receiver. When asked why he felt that this is true his answer was â€Å"because we’re just nasty like that. † In regards to myths he recalled one of his high school classmates expressing to him that the reason blacks were better was because they still had some monkey left in them. Interviewee # 3, a white college graduate, non-athlete articulated that blacks are better at any sport they try but not in any positions that require brain power or thought. He said that they are not usually good quarterbacks because they aren’t smart enough. When I asked him why, his response was, â€Å"because they are dumb N’s†. He believes that they become athletes because they have no other options to get a job or get rich, unless they can rap. He also stated that the reason they can run so fast is because they are used to running from the cops. Interviewee # 4, A white male who is a former athlete said that he believes that African Americans are superior in all sports except for lacrosse and hockey, and that the reason for this is because they are much more expensive to start up and maintain- as opposed to soccer/football/basketball where all you need is a ball really. He thinks black people on the whole start out life economically feeble compared to whites and believes in the myth that they have been evolved into more muscular and stronger people because of the process of natural selection during slavery where the slave owners bought the biggest and strongest, and they’re offspring are the ones that created the people that are dominating in sports now. My last interviewee was a female African American basketball player who felt that African Americans dominate in football and basketball because it is the only sport they want to play so they strive for it. She also said that blacks are more aggressive because it means more to them. In the majority of my interviews the participants mentioned what Sailes referred to as the Mandingo Theory, in which the physical superiority of African Americans is attributed to the selection and so called breeding process along with the manual labor performed during the days of slavery. The psychological and dumb jock theories were also articulated in the answers I received from the white students for they all said at some point or another during the interview that African Americans are intellectually inferior and all they have going for them is sports, and even in the world of sports there are positions that they are mentally incapable of occupying. The one thing that I believe all the participants agreed on both black and white is that African Americans are somehow genetically different. I was really taken aback by my findings. Even though I have learned throughout this semester that people are more racist than I ever thought they were, I didn’t realize that this racism is existent in literally everything. I’m not really into sports and do not pay attention to them, so I had no idea that people felt this way about African American athletes. So, it seems as though African Americans are battling this war on racism on yet another front.

Your time is limited... - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 653 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2019/06/10 Category Philosophy Essay Level High school Tags: Value of Life Essay Did you like this example? Your time is limited, so dont waste it living someone elsers life.(Steve Jobs). Life has a special meaning because it was given to us by God. However, individuals have a habit of forgetting to be grateful and thankful of their own. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Your time is limited" essay for you Create order In the speech of Steve Jobs, it explains how people only got one chance at life, so they have to enjoy it now while they can. Also, individuals need to value their life more. In Steve Jobs quote, Stay hungry. Stay foolish., it has connections towards other authorrs articles. The theme is to keep moving forward at life no matter what. Amanda Ripley, Roger Ebert, and Steve Jobs all have connections to Stay hungry. Stay foolish. because they all stood hungry and achieved at life and they stood foolish by taking life changing risks. Amanda Ripley gave the same meaning as Steve Jobs did on cherishing life. She explains how you can not trade life for anything because it is so much valuable: to place as much of a value on that lost loved one as they can. So here is where they seek to amplify the value on that lost loved one as they can. They seek to amplify the value of that memory. (Ripley). What this quote says is that life is too valuable for it to be lost. She states that individuals should be wanting more for than what they lost. Ripley also argues that all life is equal: She says, (all lives are equal (Ripley). This quote is saying that equality should be in all lives of humanity. Another connection is Roger Ebert who also was diagnosed with cancer. The advice in his article is to never give up. Cancer changed Ebertrs perspective on life and it made him to cherish his own life. Also, he did not give up from this brutal disease. Ebert is still himself: He says, Itrs saving me. When I am writing my problems become invisible and I am the same person I always was. All is well. I am the same person I was always. (Ebert). This quote is saying that Ebert is not afraid of death because he did everything and acomplished so much in life. Roger Ebert taught people when something does not go in our way in life, never give up. Steve Jobs was a man who changed his perspective on life. Jobs had his own company, Apple. He, in fact, was the creator of Apple. However, he was later kicked and replaced out of his own company, but Jobs is did not let this stop him from getting his company back. As he was planning to get his job back, Jobs was diagnosed with cancer. He stated his cancer was the best thing that ever happened to him because it drove him to not give up and try new and better things. This later resulted in getting his job back as director of Apple: He says Remembering that Ill be dead soon is the most important tool Ive ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life (Jobs). This quote shows that Jobs kept moving forward even though he was diagnosed with cancer. Cancer was his drive to keep trying new things in which resulted in getting his job back. A call to action is to not let anyone nor anything have a bad impact on your life. The secret for a good life is to keep on cherishing life, to not give up, and to keep moving forward. These advice are what the authors and Steve Jobs gave individuals. In conclusion, Steve Jobs quote, Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish. has connections with Roger Ebert, Amanda Ripley, and not other than Steve Jobs himself.  Works Cited Jobs, Steve. Youve Got to Find What You Love. Stanford Report, 14 June 2005 Jones, Chris. Roger Ebert: The Essential Man. Esquire, 16 Feb. 2010. Ripley, Amanda. What is a Life Worth. Time, 11 Feb. 2002.

Brain versus Mind By Logic,A Historically Irresolvable...

Brain versus Mind By Logic,A Historically Irresolvable Debate As computer and neuroscience technology progresses, the perceived role of the human brain grows ever more complex and seemingly more determinant as to what makes a person, a self. Research and development projects in both the fields of neuroscience and artificial intelligence add fire to the Mind versus Brain debate. Are the biochemical mechanics of the brain sufficient explanation for human behavior, or is there a â€Å"mind†, distinct from the brain, which harbors free will? In other words, are human thoughts and conscious actions[1] entirely based on science or on purposive cause, calling for unscientific philosophy and/or religion? Whether there is a teleological†¦show more content†¦At rest, or when not excited, the cell has a central shaft, an axon, whose interior is 70mv (millivolts) negative with respect to its exterior.[5] This polarization is due to a transmembrane ion gradient; the exterior medium of the neuron is ten times richer in sodium ions ( ) than th e interior, and the interior is ten times richer in potassium ions ( ).[6] When the neuron is excited, axon permeability to increases and a wave of voltage passes through the axon like a flame along a firecracker fuse. When the voltage, the electrical signal, reaches the posterior end of the neuron, it triggers the release of chemicals called neurotransmitters across a physical gap, known as a synapse, between the neuron and another â€Å"postsynaptic† neuron.[7] That is how signals pass between neurons in the human brain. As to how signals originate, the cell body is believed to generate an electrical impulse, by means unknown.[8] Also unclear is how individual neurons or ganglia might physically interact to form a thought or a conscious action.[9] The belief that interaction between individual neurons or ganglia can form a thought or conscious action is the purely mechanical explanation for human behavior and brain activity and is both radically reductionistic and deterministic. This belief, better

Lester B. Pearson and the Suez Canal Crisis - 1449 Words

The Suez crisis was a conflict that could have easily turned into a third World War. With a battle between the Israelis and Egyptians at Sinai, the British and French invasion of Egypt, and nuclear threats from the Soviet Union, all of the elements were present to escalate the conflict and pull other countries into the fray. Canada had no direct ties to the Suez crisis, in terms of control or economic interest. However, Canadian Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Lester B. Pearson, persuaded the UN General Assembly to send in the United Nations Emergency Force. Even though Lester B. Pearson dismayed the Commonwealth with his measures for peace, Canada was recognized for starting the first ever United Nations Peacekeeping mission.†¦show more content†¦The Israeli advance towards the canal is a fake to show the world that Egypt in danger of being overthrown by the Israelis. The British and French then dissimulate as peacekeepers, trying to diffuse then tension between Egy pt and Israel. They offer Nasser an ultimatum: â€Å"Israel and Egypt are to cease fighting or the two Western powers will intervene†. On the 31st of October this ultimatum expires and France and Britain attack, bombing Alexandria and sending in thousands of troops. Russia then threatens Britain and France with Nuclear weapons. At this point it looks as though the world is on the brink of another World War. Canada had no interest to the Suez crisis, in terms of control, economic or military interest, but Lester B. Pearson saw an opportunity to intervene. While the Cabinet in Ottawa debated about the attack on Egypt, the UN Security Council met in New York. Even though Canada did not have a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council, Lester B. Pearson and the Foreign Affairs delegation of Canada worked towards building an agreement for the proposal to the UN, on the Suez Crisis. Encouraged by the US, Yugoslavia makes a â€Å"Uniting for Peace resolution†, which enables a debate to be moved to the General Assembly. The UK and France do not block this, however, negative votes would not constitute a veto. The Suez CanalShow MoreRelatedEssay about The Establishment of the United Nations Emergency Force705 Words   |  3 PagesUN states voted in favor of Lester Pearson’s idea of establishing a large scale peacekeeping force. 1 This large scale peacekeeping force wou ld be known as the United Nations Emergency Force ( UNEF) and would be responsible to securing an end to the Suez Crisis. The idea was for the British,French and Israeli forces to withdraw from the canal and the UNEF would remain in the canal area stabilizing the situation. 2 The UNEF was responsible for looking after the Suez Canal, facilitating the departureRead MoreLester B. Pearson: 14th Prime Minister of Canada757 Words   |  3 Pagespeace or extinction. † 1 and Lester B. Pearson was definitely a man of peace. To those who don’t know who Lester B. Pearson is, he’s the fourteenth Prime Minister of Canada, that served from April 22. 1963 - April 20. 1968 2. During his time as Prime Minister, he’s accomplished many things, and that’s why I believe that Lester B. Pearson is the greatest Canadian. Not many people recognize what the Suez Crisis is, but to those who do, they all know that Lester B. Pearson played a crucial role in theRead MoreCanada, A Rising Middle Power1636 Words   |  7 PagesCanada and the UN without referring to Lester Pearson. Almost elected as the first Secretary General, Pearson believed that â€Å"Canada had a responsibility to participate as actively as possible in any international activity that might lessen the chance of wars breaking out,†6. Pearson, one of Canadas most recognized diplomats, saw the potential in the UN to maintain world peace, but in order to do this it needed a military force in order to be effective7. Pearson was instrumental in the creation ofRead MoreLester B Pearson1167 Words   |  5 Pagesto mind is Lester Bowles Pearson. He did not shape the world’s history but he did shape Canada’s history; he made Canada to what it is today, he introduced Universal Medicare to all Canadians, and he created the United Nations peacekeeping force. To begin, Lester B. Pearson helped make Canada. He made it to what it is to this day, he is the Prime Minister â€Å"who gave Canada the identity that we have today† (thegauntlet.ca). One of the things he did was give Canada its flag. Pearson went to theRead MoreThe Cold War During World War II2269 Words   |  10 Pagessupported by the Unites States’ forces. Canada which supported United States sent out twenty six thousand military personal and five-hundred sixteen Canadians died as part of this conflict. Another event that took place during the Cold War is the Suez Crisis. Furthermore, another important event during the Cold War was the Arms Race. As the atomic bomb dropped two times in Japan, concluding World War II, a new weapon was introduced to the world. This new weapon showed how much devastating humans areRead MoreThe Actions of Three Great Men and How They Made Canada Stronger900 Words   |  4 Pageshad a â€Å"weak† view of the nation. During the 2 0th century, there were however 3 men that did prove that they did what they did not just only for themselves, but for the commonwealth of the population. These 3 men, William Lyon Mackenzie King, Lester Bowles Pearson, and Pierre Elliot Trudeau shaped Canada in making Canada stronger. William Lyon Mackenzie King was the 10th Prime Minister of Canada. During his time in office, he created the Unemployment Insurance Act, formed the Old Age Pensions ActRead MoreCanada s Sovereign And Morally Just Approach1514 Words   |  7 Pageshighly involved in global issues and has held itself on moral grounds, despite some opposing influence. Canada’s sovereign and morally just approach can be seen in many events in the 20th century, such as in the Second World War, the Korean War, the Suez Crisis and the Vietnam War. As well, Canada’s imperfect, yet improving immigration policy displays the acceptance and unbiased approach Canada has towards people of different backgrounds. Despite some minor missteps and impediments, Canada would make anRead MoreCanada During the Post-War Period1190 Words   |  5 Pagesthey are today. Surfacing tension between French-English speaking Canadians lead Lester B. Pearson to establish the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Bicul turalism in 1963 (Beyond Words - Issue 5). This set up would seek advice on how to run a country on partnership between two founding races. This also stated that English and French Canadians must be equal and that the government must function in both languages. Pearson was in fear that if Quebeckers felt as if they didn’t belong to Canada that theRead MoreCanada s Role During The World Since 19451062 Words   |  5 Pagesrole in the drafting of the UN Charter. John Humphrey is often given credit for drafting the Charter of the UN. The Canadian Prime Minister at the time, Lester B. Pearson played a key role in solving many of the problems the UN faced. Lester Pearson even received the Nobel Peace Prize for resolving a major problem the UN faced; the Suez Crisis. After WWII had ended, a Cold War broke out between the 2 superpowers of the world at the time, the United States and the Soviet Union. It was a war foughtRead MoreThe End Of The Second World War Essay1640 Words   |  7 Pagesescalation in Korea that could have ended in WWIII.† Indeed, preventing the negative consequences of a decisive American victory against North Korea was critical in the Canadian government’s view. For over a year while the war was still raging, Lester B. Pearson, Secretary of State for External Affairs of Canada and President of the General Assembly of the United Nations, exercised a diplomacy of constraint to restrain the American role in Korea and led the negotiations between the USA and China. Canada

American History Emerson and Whitman Free Essays

In a democracy Emerson wrote that man does not buy his rights and pay for his privileges. He has every right to speak up on an issue and does not need to pay the government to do so. Likewise he does not need to pay to cast his vote in an election. We will write a custom essay sample on American History: Emerson and Whitman or any similar topic only for you Order Now In a democracy man observes rules because doing so is the proper thing. He can not buy his way out to be exempted from obeying laws. The young will benefit from the fruits of democracy because the old shall have had their time. If the youth is able to use their God-given gift of â€Å"piquancy and charm† they would make the older generation â€Å"very unnecessary. † They would know how to take care of themselves and secure their future. Democracy for Whitman is where people are able to go about their daily lives without fear, â€Å"the machinist rolls up his sleeves, the policeman travels his beat, and the gatekeeper marks who pass. † Obviously, the people are the ones who enjoy the fruits of democracy as it allows them to pursue their business in the best and legal means without doing harm to others. According to Emerson it is easier to conform or to adapt to what the collective society stands for, but to be truly independent one must hold on to what he believes in despite overwhelming opposition. He has only his conscience to trust as to what is right and what is wrong. This attitude is what will spell the big difference â€Å"between greatness and meanness. † Whitman was more poetic in his take of independence. He said that it is when one has the â€Å"best of time and space, was never measured and will never be measured. † It meant that when a man is given the opportunity to do what he wanted, given the freedom to use it the way he thought fit is Whitman’s take on independence. Emerson believed that for man to be self-reliant he must first know himself, love his strengths and accept his weaknesses. While nature abounds with what can feed, clothe, and shelter man, he must tap and work on them by his own sweat or labor. Man is so endowed by God that there is nothing he can not do if he tries. Whitman likened self-reliance to travel. He showed a friend what there is to see in places near and far, and the road to take. The analogy could very well mean life in general. He can only be with the friend at some point but the rest will be up to the friend. He told his friend that â€Å"he must travel it for himself. † In life there are questions which answers â€Å"he must find out for yourself. † On cultural independence, Emerson challenged old traditions of the Church, to obey without question. He maintained that it was one’s conscience that he must listen to and not dead institutions and irrelevant societies. Whitman had a different approach with institutions, he was more for maintaining the status quo. Whitman wrote, â€Å"I accept reality and dare not question it, materialism first and last imbuing. † As for the spirit of social experimentation, Emerson opposed philanthropies of giving college grants, building half-way homes, alms-giving and organizing charities to the undeserving and regrets every cent and dollar doled out, despite the â€Å"obligation to put all poor men in good situations. † As for the issue of the slavery and the plight of the Blacks in Africa, Emerson said that â€Å"love afar is spite at home. He was for ensuring the welfare of one’s own before one can be so concerned with those of others. As for Whitman he welcomed, fed and cared for a runaway slave. He treated everyone equally, be they â€Å"the wicked or the righteous. † Emerson was among the American Transcendentalists and Romanticists from New England, who believed in the power of the mind which God had use to reveal the truth. He listened to the â€Å"voice of the mind. † Whitman was a Romantic writer especially with his association of the commonplace to Nature, like â€Å"the grass is itself a child, the produced babe of the vegetation. † Emerson approached Nature in the context of Man. He referred to â€Å"the nonchalance of boys as a healthy attitude of human nature,† and â€Å"pretty oracles nature yields us are the face and behavior of children, babes and brutes. † Whitman did not separate man, animals, the grass, the flowers, the fishes and the birds as he treats them all as Nature. He told of the activities of each without distinction of man and animal, bird or fish, flower or grass, â€Å"the wolverine sets traps, the young fellow drives the express wagon, the wild gander leads his pack. † Works Cited Emerson, R. W. â€Å"Self-Reliance. † Whitman, W. â€Å"Song of Myself. † How to cite American History: Emerson and Whitman, Papers

Stereotypes of Teenagers free essay sample

Being a teenager doesn’t just define your age, it classifies you into a pre-determined stereotype where people see you differently; you are no longer â€Å"that sweet Jenny girl who lives down the street†, you are now a reckless teenager who is clawing at a chance to rebel or throw a raging Project X worthy party. In our immature years ranging from around 12-18, teenagers are generally seen as being rowdy, irresponsible, and sneaky, and generally speaking, these assumptions are pretty accurate, based on how many times we’ve been grounded from our parents. However, not all adolescents fall into this classification of being â€Å"young, wild, and free†; I am the exact opposite of what someone my age is expected to be- I pride myself on being responsible, trustworthy, and just a better person all around. I try my hardest to stay out of the typical stereotype of a â€Å"teenager†, and I think I do a pretty good job at it. We will write a custom essay sample on Stereotypes of Teenagers or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page One thought that is generally associated with the facade of teenagers are parties- everything about them. Throwing parties, attending parties, getting wasted at parties, getting caught at parties, or maybe even getting arrested at parties. Whenever a boy or girl at my school says something like â€Å"my parents are going out of town for a week on vacation†, nine out of ten times the responding question will be along the lines of â€Å"are you going to have a party? † or â€Å"nice, what address can I tell people to come to? †. So, adolescents like to have fun, but usually it’s to a dangerous extent. Even dating back to middle school, I can recall old stories of Halloween parties getting busted by cops because some parents forgot to lock their liquor cabinets, and the kids wanted to get a little rowdy. But that’s just an innocent eighth grade party- today, you can take it to even more extreme levels with the high school parties, which almost always includes marijuana or other deadly drugs. So why do teenagers like to participate in these activities, when they normally only end in turmoil? Throughout my high school career, I have not attended many parties, which I do not have a problem with. I am not the kind of person who wants to publicly humiliate myself by getting drunk just so I can have a â€Å"good† time. I have witnessed numerous accounts of teenagers being sent away to private schools, or being thrown out of the house by participating in these â€Å"typical high school activities†. But why do you need narcotics and liquid courage to be a fun person to hang out with on a Friday night? You don’t, you’re just fooling yourself. Another place teenagers are stereotyped and looked down upon is in a working environment. When something goes wrong, the excuse is â€Å"oh, they’re just a teenager, they don’t know any better†. But some of us do know better. There is a popular television show on the TLC network called Restaurant Stakeout; this show is a prime example of teenagers, taking advantage and putting forth a bad effort at their work place. Willie Degel is a well-known respected restauranteur and restaurant owner. He goes in to struggling restaurants and places hidden cameras in the work place where he watches the employees as they handle their customers and shift responsibilities. Most of the time, the cameras focus on the poor performing employees, such as the ones who yell at customers, throw things at them, spill food, treat people with disrespect, or lie to their managers. More often than not, these irresponsible workers just happen to be teenagers. But is anyone really surprised at this behavior? After all, you would never see the oh-so-mature adult treating another adult with straight up disrespect, would you? Well certainly not without good reason. I work in a bakery and have witnessed my current boss, Dee, handle situations with the same kind of mindset that a teenager would have. When a customer was rude and impatient with one of my co-workers and caused too much unnecessary drama, Dee thought it would be nice to give that customer a taste of her own medicine†¦by throwing a cake right in her face. Was this the mature thing to do? Not necessarily, and certainly not from any rational adults point of view. But logically thinking, all of these â€Å"rational adults† were once â€Å"immature teenagers† at one point, right? Maybe we never do grow completely out of our child-like mindsets. The only thing worse than grown-ups acting like teenagers are when teenagers fulfill the stereotype that is thrust upon them. I used to work at Five Guys Burgers and Fries, where I saw incorrect handling of problems and situations by my fellow teenage coworkers. When someone was unhappy with their meal, the employee wouldn’t handle the situation themselves, but instead hand it off to someone else, which was usually me. I didn’t always enjoy dealing with the angry guests, but it taught me how to handle unhappy people in a positive way, which has helped me now in my current job and the other social aspects of my life as a whole. Teenagers have mastered the art of one thing: lying. Well, for the most part anyways. We think we are so good at lying that we can hide almost anything from our parents. Sometimes, this works. Other times, you get caught in your lie, and you end up getting in lots of trouble. My mother, for example, is excellent at telling when I am fibbing to her, and she will call me out on it. This has taught me to just be an honest person, and not to do things that would result in me lying about where I am or what I am doing. Other teenagers at my school however have mastered the art of lying and sneaking around, and basically can get away with anything if they wanted to. If a boy wants to sneak out to go buy alcohol and get drunk, he knows just what to tell his parents to make them believe differently. If a girl wants to go to a party and hang out with a guy her parents don’t approve of, she just has to say the usual â€Å"I’m sleeping over at Jessica’s tonight†. These lies and dishonesty are what helps create the stereotype of untrustworthy and dishonest teenagers- we think we can get away with everything and we are invincible, when in reality we’re just adolescents who don’t know any better. Why have teenagers changed so much over time that now being classified as a â€Å"teenager† automatically has a negative connotation with it? I’m sure when my parents were teenagers, they were probably looked down upon too, but not in this much of an immature and irresponsible light as adolescents today are. Why have the times changed so much that because I am a teenager, I am automatically looked at as being an irrational, disrespectful, sneaky party animal? When I am not like that at all? I wouldn’t say I am trying to completely break the stereotype for my age group, but I am definitely trying to change it so people don’t view me in that negative way. So those two little words that fit together so perfectly are going to be attached with a negative connotation for many more years to come, as the stereotyping of teenagers are just going to become deeper as the actions we do become worse and worse. As we grow older and move on to have children of our own that will grow into these crazy adolescents, where will we draw the line with them? Why kind of people will they turn out to be? What will be considered socially acceptable for their age group by the time they are in high school? If we keep heading in the direction we are now, it worries me to know what our future generations have in store. Falter